Follow by Email

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

173 - more grist to the mill

Dear Reader,

Here's another hopeful submission.


Science is determined by experimental evidence. Nothing else cuts it. If you have got the demonstrable evidence – then the claim associated with that evidence becomes incontrovertible. The Wright brothers, for example, were flying their machines at a time when our academics were teaching the impossibility of heavier than air flight. And the Wright brothers won that argument.

We all know that claims associated with the liberation of clean free and abundant energy – although a topic that proliferates our internet – is also unhappily associated with the profligate high hopes of eccentric scientists who are variously dupes or duped – banging on about the possibility or the reality of free and abundant and clean electric energy. These dreamers claim that conspiracies abound – that suppress this information.

Mainstream has determined that energy is limited by the amount of energy delivered. A limitless supply of energy would require that more energy is returned to a supply source than delivered. And that much is impossible. Therefore any claims to ‘exceed unity’, as it’s called, are considered to be fallacious at best. They are, therefore, not worth investigating.

Both of which arguments are flawed. Experimental proof – if it is conclusive enough – is not arguable. Therefore those energy cooks must produce the required evidence. And by the same token those mainstream adherents, our academics, must evaluate that evidence – if and when it’s produced. That’s only reasonable and fair.

And here’s where the truth of experimental evidence becomes a victim of pure prejudice that has no part in any science at all. We have incontrovertible proof of more energy being returned to a battery supply source than was delivered by the battery, which in science parlance is known of as a co-efficient of performance that exceeds 1. In fact it is INFINITE COP. This evidence is open sourced and well documented – has been publicly displayed, has been carefully measured, was required in terms of a field model that does not deviate from classical principles – has been submitted for publication 5 times in reviewed journals – and that is entirely ignored by our academics. And we all know. We require academic accreditation to progress this knowledge. Yet those academics – to a man – REFUSE to evaluate that experimental evidence.

So. Be informed. There is carefully documented evidence that our Thermodynamic Laws need to be re-assessed as they relate to the electromagnetic interaction. The proof of this claim has been accredited by companies including, BP (SA), SASOL (SA), ABB Research (NC USA), among others. SASOL even offered a bursary award to advance this study. That award was declined by UCT. Those companies have allowed reference to their accreditation in the publication of early tests in a technical (un-reviewed) paper. The final tests for this evidence, has been submitted for publication to a reviewed journal. This is the fourth attempt at publication. We are still to hear if the paper is to be accepted. We have been struggling for over a decade to get this evidence to the academic workbenches. But we are gravely hampered as it is only the prejudice in those institutions that mitigates against a fair or, indeed, ANY evaluation, of this scientific experiment.

This refusal to acknowledge experimental evidence confounds what would otherwise be a desirable solution to the pollutant consequences of our conventional energy usage. It is this author’s opinion that there is an active conspiracy that is keeping this knowledge from the public. It is a conspiracy that, unhappily, is greatly assisted by the prejudice of our learned and revered. Should this ‘truth’ be liberated from its embargo – then the whole world would benefit from this abundant source of energy which would put paid to our concerns related to our own responsibility for carbon pollution.

The piece de resistance – the final flourish of this experimental evidence - is that the model and the consequences – are required in terms of the standard model. Therefore there is nothing within known science that conflicts with this result. Which is extraordinary – considering the weight of all that academic prejudice.

Golly. I must be ever and excessively hopeful. lol
Kindest regards,

172 - more on those foundational concepts

Dear Reader,

Those last two posts of mine have reminded me that I really need to write that paper on gravity. It is the penultimate challenge - the final challenge being to also write a paper on the strong nuclear force.

Broadly - the field model proposes that our magnetic force is a primary force. The argument in support of this is simple. A changing electric field induces a magnetic field. A changing magnetic field induces an electric field. But a changing magnetic field can interact with another magnetic field without inducing an electric field. In other words - a magnet on magnet interaction does not result in any measurable evidence of an electric field. Therefore the electric field is - at best - a secondary force that relies on the prior existence of that magnetic field - which, in turn, needs to be 'changing' or 'moving in time' in order to induce that electric interaction.

Now. Here's the thing. You can fill all known space with those highly structured magnetic fields - which it is argued - structure themselves along Faraday's Lines of Force. Start with the biggest space. That's the entire universe and its boundaries. It comprises these strings that are as broad as a whisper and as long as the boundaries of the universe. And each string comprises magnetic dipoles that are simply tiny little spherical magnets that are joined head to toe - hand in hand - south to north. Each string closes up that it forms a necklace. Well. That's the biggest all encompassing field. Then inside that field are smaller structured fields - two dimensional (saucer shaped) - that lock whole galaxies into formation. Then inside the stars of those galaxies are further two dimensional fields that lock planets into an orbit. And inside yet more localised two dimensional magnetic fields are the moons of those planets - also locked in an orbital formation.

Large blocks of coalesced matter forming those planets and moons and stars are relatively random. But the atoms that form the material of those structures are again, those two dimensional magnetic fields that hold it's particles in an orbit as fixed and predictable as the stars in the galaxies that are also held in formation.

That's the 'pattern' that is best expressed in fractals. But what is actually being proposed is that ALL is encompassed in a magnetic field. Whether it's the particles in the atom or the atoms in the planet and moons - of star structures that, in turn are in their galaxies. All is HELD within a bath of magnetic particles that form a structured coherent field of particles that are entirely invisible.

Now here's the thing. Those long strings - those great loops - those necklaces comprising the magnetic dipoles as its beads, they are always enclosing coalesced matter in whatever form that matter takes. In other words - the material is inside the magnet. Therefore, being smaller than the 'field of influence' of the magnet - the material itself only ever experiences one part of that bigger magnetic field.

Now again. The question is this? What actually is that bigger magnetic field doing? Well. It's argued that it is possible to get a perfect charge alignment of each string - that north/south alignment of the magnetic dipoles. But it is impossible to get a coherent charge distribution of each dipole with the dipoles in adjacent strings. Therefore. There would be a continual and PERPETUAL interaction of each dipole to another to either repel or attract to a neighbouring dipole - which would result in a movement towards or away. That's in line with our Laws of Charge. Then in moving towards or away from a neighbouring string, then each movement would displace an adjoined dipole in each string. Which would displace that dipole, which, being inside a string, would then displace every dipole in that entire string to describe the first step of an orbit. Many such steps and we get an orbiting string, propelling the neighbouring strings into an orbit - and so on - throughout the field. That means that the entire field would orbit. And, if the field is as coherent as is proposed, then that orbit would share a single justification. It would spin left to right. Or right to left.

But if matter is held inside that string then the matter inside it would only experience a single justification. Think of it like this. We on earth have only ever experienced a single direction - one half of - the entire orbit of our earths' magnetic field. The second half of each orbit is inside the material of the earth itself moving from the south pole to the north. Outside - the surface of the planet - correspondingly - has only experienced the north/south justification. That's a single direction. Which is also just a single charge. In other words - to the best of our knowledge - nothing on earth has had the dubious pleasure of experiencing the both charges from our contained magnetic field.

I'll get back to this. But - nota bene - if charge is determined by direction within a magnetic field and if the magnetic field has a justification - which is unarguable - then, in truth, all the material on the earth has only ever interacted with one half of the orbit of the entire magnetic field - or only 1 half of it's magnetic field's potential charge.

Kindest regards